Then the full council met to discuss legislation that is pending in Annapolis. No real news there but we are working closely with our delegation to protect the county from a proposal to change who is responsible for funding teacher pensions. The state has been responsible for that for 85 years but has managed the pension badly and now wants to foist the pension deficit onto county governments. MontgomeryCounty would be responsible for paying over $40 million in state pension funding in just the first year alone, and according to the state projections these costs are expected to increase about 10% per year.
In the afternoon, at a joint meeting of the GO committee with the Planning, Housing and Economic Development Committee we discussed concerns about small businesses and redevelopment. I was pleased to hear that the CountyExecutive is depositing $2 million into the revolving small business loan program; I requested that the council discuss policy objectives for how those loans would be made. Can we fund clean-tech startups? Child care companies? Can we target the loans to problems we want to address, such as unemployment in the Hispanic community?
I was also pleased to learn that the CountyExecutive is exploring partnerships with community banks to make loans, perhaps helping close deals on certain loans that the banks would not be able to fully finance themselves.
These are promising developments—we can and must do better to grow our own job creator right here in MontgomeryCounty.
To polish off the day, or evening, I met with a group of activists in the Chevy Chase area that calls itself the “District 1 caucus.” Included among them was former Councilmember Scot Fosler. We had an interesting conversation about the nature of the CountyExecutive position. Did you know that FairfaxCounty does not have an elected CountyExecutive? They have a county manager type position. It was a treat to meet Scot; last Friday I met Bill Scher, also a former council member.
Which reminds me that today I got a call from former Governor Parris Glendening, who is inviting me to join a select group of local officials from around the country in a program hosted by Smart Growth America, the non-profit policy organization that he founded. I was thrilled to get the Governor’s call and I’m looking forward to getting involved with this effort to support and build smart growth champions around the country.
Meanwhile tomorrow at full council session I am introducing a new bill that I drafted on big box retailing issues and considering recommendations I want to make for our county cable plan operations. And tomorrow our T&E committee will return, and possibly conclude, the issue of take home vehicles for county employees that I have been working on for some time.
The County Council is debating a proposal to address the impacts from large commercial retail operations or “big boxes”. The discussion has been prompted by Council President Valerie Ervin’sbill that would require new retailers with more than 75,000 square feet of space to negotiate with community groups prior to opening. I have heard from a lot of constituents about this issue. I’d like to share my thoughts with you and hear what you think.
Big box retailers are very profitable. In 2010, Wal-Mart earned $17 billion in after-tax net income. That same year, Home Depot earned $3.3 billion, Target earned $2.9 billion and Best Buy earned $1.4 billion in after-tax net income. At the same time, a significant number ofstudies have found that big boxes have had detrimental effects on wages, employment, small businesses, public health care costs and traffic. I believe that some big box retailing necessitates additional community protections. That is why I agreed to co-sponsor the Council President’s bill. The bill requires incoming big box retailers to negotiate “community benefit agreements” with at least three community groups. The bill would seem to create the likelihood that certain community groups would get “benefits” as a result of a big box coming in. For example, a new swimming pool or support for a library in one community, or, elsewhere, local hiring preferences. It is unclear whether the bill would actually result in any benefits for the communities, however, as the only requirement is negotiation, not agreement.
Community benefits agreements are not the only proposal for addressing big box impacts. The question is, what problems are we trying to solve? Two problems I am very concerned about are the wages and benefits issues facing workers; and the big box impacts that affect our ability to create great places to live. On the first topic, the federal National Labor Relations Act prevents local governments from directly regulating wages and benefits in purely private-sector circumstances. But when county funding is involved, the county has a right to attach conditions to that funding. The county already requires construction contractors on county projects to pay prevailing wages. It also requires county-employed service contractors to pay living wages to their employees. Perhaps recipients of county economic development grants, loans and incentives should be required to pay living wages and health benefits. That would make sure that county money does not subsidize low-wage job creation, which will not sustain our quality of life. On the second issue, I am concerned that big boxes in our commercial+retail+residential areas will undermine the core vision of a community designed according to principles of housing opportunity, walkability and public transportation.
The county has abundant powers to regulate land use through its zoning authority. In 2004, the county passed azoning text amendment requiring combination retail + grocery stores with more than 120,000 square feet to obtain a special exception to operate. The Board of Appeals is empowered to make requirements on noise, lighting, traffic remediation, buffers, parking, signs and other issues. The county’s Planning Board can also address similar issues in its planning and approval process, and is well suited to address the challenges that big boxes pose for community building. I believe we need to reexamine these regulations for big box stores. The fact that the proposedAspen Hill Wal-Mart is planned to be 118,000 square feet – a bare 2,000 square feet below the county’s current threshold for a special exception – argues that some sort of reevaluation of our requirements may be in order. Another Wal-Mart on Rockville Pike would be situated one-third of a mile from the Twinbrook Metro. This location is prime real estate for our continuing efforts on the Pike to build a first class community where you would want to live, shop and work. I share the view, articulated by my council colleague Roger Berliner, that we must develop the Pike consistent with the principles of walkability, with a public-transportation centered strategy. The Wal-Mart as proposed would not accomplish that. We have to strike a balance between providing the consumer choices our residents deserve and mitigating the impact of huge commercial establishments on our environment, mobility and labor markets. I’d like to get to that balance and I think we can get it done.
But I’d like to hear what you think. How would you do it? What ideas would you put on the table? Please let me know by commenting here or emailing me. Thanks!
I’ve heard from many of you concerning Bill 33-11, known as the Community Benefits Agreement bill. As you can see from the emails below, there are a wide range of views regarding this bill. What do you think of it? Read the bill or send me a message if you need more details!
Donna R. Savage:
I cannot attend the public hearing for this bill on Tuesday evening, November 1, so please accept this email in lieu of my personal testimony.
I support the testimony you’ll hear tonight from the Kensington Heights Civic Association and I support the general purpose of this proposed legislation, although there are many details that appear to be missing that would enhance its effectiveness.
However, it is my considered opinion that, through this bill, the County would be placing the responsibility for accepting a big box store on the community — which is NOT where such responsibility should lie.
If the Council knows (and I believe you do) that big box stores present significant problems for communities, especially in our dense Downcounty areas, then all of you should stand up and say so. If you don’t want them here, say so — and legislate accordingly. Be clear about your vision of growth for our County. The responsibility for that vision and for its implementation lies squarely in your collective laps.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed legislation.
I have lived in Montgomery county for most of my life and have seen our county grow. I would like to see the big box community empowerment bill passed as I feel many of the big box stores (particularly Wal Mart) are interested in coming to our community to be leeches who suck away jobs and tax revenue instead of supportive active members of the community. I am taking the time to write this to hope my voice is heard.
Abigail Brassil Adelman:
Council Chair Valerie Ervin and County Council Members,
I am writing to support with some reservations the above mentioned Bill 33-11. In particular, I wish to express support for lines 73-75as written. This is very important as in my community, KensingtonHeights, we have experienced great difficulty dealing with Costco concerning the specifics of their yet to be built new store in Wheaton at Westfield Mall.
Last week, on Tuesday, October 25, 2011 the Kensington Heights Citizens Association (KHCA) met with 2 Costco officials and 13 of their hired ‘experts’. The meeting ended at with NO mention of a schedule for site preparation and demolition mentioned or discussed.
At , on October 26, 7 hours later, in violation of the Noise Control Ordinance and exceeding the 85 decibels allowed for construction from to , demolition started on the old HechtsBuilding. Why? The poorly prepared and poorly secured site along with the unlawful timing points to undue haste to “start” the project. It has now been halted.
The is only one reason why this situation occurred: the proposal of Bill 33-11. Westfield and Costco will point to this poorly prepared and secured site to claim that the project was already underway when (and if) the proposed legislation is passed.
As a citizen and a taxpayer , I am respectfully requesting that the clause (lines 73-75) stand as written and the Costco NOT BE ALLOWED any ‘grandfathering opportunity’. Any claim by Westfield or Costco that the project was ‘underway’ on October 26 is false and should be so noted.
Thank you for your consideration in this very important issue.
Dean S. Cooper:
In these tough economic times, which you’ve made worse with your proposals for anti-business legislation, it’s amazing that any businesses would want to do business in MontgomeryCounty! I don’t understand why you are now proposing legislation to deter big box stores, and am especially dismayed that you’d have this apply to the Costco which you previously approved and we are waiting to be built at WheatonPlaza. Come on: we need the jobs and the taxes from these businesses.
I have been a resident of this County for almost 40 years and it has becoming increasingly difficult to remain a resident. I see that the Council is about to dictate to private business that they can no longer use their business acumen to make decisions on their own regarding such things as where best to locate a business enterprise, but will have to negotiate with civil and governmental entities, as if these have any foggy notion what business is all about. I refer to Bill 33-11 Urban Renewal and Community Development – Community Benefits Agreements – Large Retail Stores.
This legislation is an abomination and must be killed before it places too much power and potential for more graft in the hands of politicians and self-interest groups. Dictating to a business who to hire, where to locate and what is to be the actual design of a store goes beyond the pale. Is this Council trying to drive business out of the county and make this a more inhospitable county in which to do business? Do more of our citizens have to flee this county for a less dictatorial county/state in order to free ourselves of actions such as these? Reminds me of the ridiculous action by President Obama’s NLRB preventing Boeing from building new airliners in So. Carolina, forcing China to cancel orders and instead buy from Airbus. Is this the kind of atmosphere this County Council wishes to foster here in Montgomery Country? WAKE UP, COUNCIL MEMBERS AND DO WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THE COUNTY AND ITS CITIZENS.
As a native Washingtonian (3rd generation), a current downtown Silver Spring resident, and employee of a Bethesda-based firm founded in 1890 (the second oldest continuously operating business in Greater Washington), it has come to my attention and to the attention of the members of our firm, our families, and what I would consider the greater community at-large that legislation such as the proposed Bill 33-11 is an unnecessary and unproductive use of the council’s time, and an absolute detriment to our county and community of registered voters. The Community Benefits Agreement legislation is at best redundant to federal and state laws regulating employment practices, redundant to the County’s current regulatory review process and at worst, another example of MontgomeryCounty’s trend towards business unfriendliness, putting us at an even further comparative disadvantage to our neighbors in DC and Virginia. Having worked in Bethesda for the last 10 years, and having seen several good firms move their Headquarters out of the County (like a CoStar for example), this is a serious concern!
As an employee of a firm who will be making a relocation decision in the next 12-18 months, legislation like this makes it measurably easier to move out of the area, quite candidly. I won’t beleaguer you with charged rhetoric, but simply request you do what I personally, the members of my community, the Chambers in the county, and the area at large demands you do – VOTE AGAINST THIS BILL!
Arnold J. Kohn
I would like to register my opposition to this measure. If community members are concerned about a specific land development application, they would have ample opportunity to air their concerns before the Planning Board. Site plan applications currently require applicants to meet with community members prior to the public hearing on their applications. Many of these community meetings already result in voluntary developer-community benefit agreements under the current procedures.
And Planning Board hearings are open public events at which community members frequently voice their opposition to specific proposals. I have personally seen Planning Board members act during public hearings as unofficial mediators between developers and community opponents, brokering ad hoc developer concessions for the benefit of residents.
But the message that Bill 33-11 would send to future retailers looking to add County locations is, at best, that the development of their store will be difficult and costly, and at worst that they simple aren’t welcome in Montgomery County. Some retailers would, I fear, just redirect their search for new locations to other jurisdictions where they would feel more of a welcoming atmosphere; Bill 33-11 will thus be viewed as anti-business and anti-retail in particular.
County residents looking to shop in some of these large stores without convenient County locations will instead either drive by automobile to jurisdictions like Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, thus adding vehicular trips, additional traffic and air pollution to Montgomery County while depriving the State of needed sales tax revenues, to say nothing of the loss of potential property taxes and income taxes for the County.
VOTE AGAINST bILL 33-11
Please do not allow any big box stores on Rockville Pike. The traffic is already dreadful!!
I started the day at a legislative breakfast on early childhood issues. As a parent of two young boys, I think a lot about the challenges our families face to provide quality child care and basic life skills for their little ones. The highlight for me was hearing comments by Dr. Josh Starr, the new MCPS superintendent. He talked about how hard the schools work to bring every child to a level of readiness to learn and the tremendous disparities that teachers must bridge. Then he said that while some school districts are starting to test kindergartners!, he believes the skills that contribute to the success of the child are not all learned in a book. There are social and behavioral skills that a child must develop early in order to be ready to learn in the first place. This strikes home with me as a parent; I certainly believe that a healthy childhood is the best foundation for academic and life success. I applaud Josh for having the courage to push against the orthodoxy.
This evening featured a town hall on Wheaton community issues. Residents came out to talk about redevelopment and big boxes, the curfew and small businesses. It was a great discussion.