By

Thoughts on the Westbard Sector Plan

Following are my prepared remarks on the Westbard Sector Plan. You may also watch a video of my remarks as delivered.


I want to start by thanking all the people who put a great deal of time into formulating this plan. Hundreds of Westbard residents – and residents across Montgomery County – who wrote, called, and came to testify to the Planning Board and the Council throughout this process, and while no one person is getting exactly the outcome they might want, I truly believe that the plan before us today is much better because of the extensive public input we’ve received – and the many changes we have made in response. Ultimately, I believe that this plan strikes the right balance between respecting the legitimate expectations of the existing community and providing a sustainable path for future growth.

I think some context might be helpful for anyone who cares to understand my vote today, so I hope my colleagues will excuse me if this is a little long:

I ran for Montgomery County Council as a progressive Democrat because I am deeply committed to the progressive values of social justice, equal opportunity, and shared responsibility. Here at the local level, these values play out very differently than they do on cable news – the county council doesn’t get much say over immigration, or gun control, or foreign policy.

Instead, we reflect our progressive values through our budget – where we ensure a robust safety net, universal health coverage, a strong education for all students. We try to build an economy that works for everyone by combining relentless economic and workforce development with efforts to level the playing field with a reasonable minimum wage, paid sick leave, hopefully one day paid family and parental leave. We do our part in the fight against discrimination and for equal rights.

But for me, the key to our community’s success is that we are welcoming and open. The message I want Montgomery County to send to the rest of the world is: Whoever you are, wherever you are from, whatever your economic status, if you are willing to work hard and be good to your neighbors, come to Montgomery County and share in the good life. You’ll have access to basic services, to training and education and jobs, your kids can go to a good school and play at great parks, and you will be safe. If you want to start a company you can find investors and a world class network of incubators, if you need employees we have the best educated workforce in the world.

I know that sounds grandiose, but at its core, the progressive values that drive the Democratic positions on economic issues, on social issues, are really about inclusion – about realizing a vision of shared prosperity – that’s it’s not enough for just the elite to prosper. And nothing is more fundamental to this vision than housing. Where you live determines the quality of your schools, what jobs you have access to, and so many other things. So I really believe that the community planning process we are engaged in today is really where the rubber meets the road for putting progressive values into action. That means providing income-restricted housing in every neighborhood to ensure that the very poorest and most vulnerable in our community have a place to live and aren’t clustered in high crime areas with little opportunity. We are breaking new ground by requiring at least 15% of new units to be affordable to low-income families. But it also means building enough housing to ensure that people of all income levels have a place here. If we don’t build enough housing to meet demand, prices rise and working class people are priced out.

And we have a moral imperative to plan this housing in an environmentally sustainable way. We know with scientific certainty what the combustion engine is doing to our planet. This means clustering new housing in existing communities rather than allowing green space to be developed and providing ways for people to get around on foot, by bike, and by public transit. While this plan is not on a metro station, and some of these new residents will certainly drive, the plan does make great strides in improving the walkability of the area and I am hopeful that expanded demand will allow us to improve bus service even further. But there can be no doubt that building townhouses on what is already a giant parking lot, just a mile from two metros, right across from the DC line, is far better for the environment than developing a farm or bulldozing a forest an hour north on 270.

Of course, our first principle must be do no harm. I don’t want to change any of the things that make Westbard wonderful. First, not a single existing home is being touched. We reduced the allowed development proposed by the Planning Board by half because we were convinced that it would have been too much, too fast for the roads, schools, and neighborhoods to handle. The plan before us today will only improve life for everyone in the Westbard sector. Traffic will be still be bad, but not noticeably worse. There will be new shopping and dining options and a great new park. The schools will still be great and Kenwood’s cherry blossoms will still bloom.

This also means making sure that the developers, who there is no doubt will make a profit from this project, pay their fair share to ensure there is adequate school and transportation capacity for all residents. This year we will be revising the Subdivision Staging Policy, which governs what developers must do and what they must pay to build in Montgomery County, and I know all my colleagues will be working to make sure that the rules line up with reality and we have the resources we need.

All in all, I truly believe this plan strikes the right balance between protecting and enhancing the things that make Westbard, and Montgomery County, such a wonderful place to live, while creating new opportunities for families from all socioeconomic backgrounds to enjoy our community’s marvelous resources.

By

Action In Montgomery for Senior Issues

On March 20th I attended the Action In Montgomery forum on seniors issues, featuring County Executive Leggett and Council President Berliner. This was without a doubt one of the most impressive community action events I have attended in Montgomery County. I knew I was in for something special when the organizer welcomed the crowd with a rousing speech about how “people working together can change the world.” I felt right at home. Then they put their values into action by bringing a representative from every faith group that was participating in the event to announce how many people they pledged to bring and how many they actually brought. Most of them exceeded their goal.

The purpose of the forum was to unveil the seniors agenda and have a public accountability session with the County Executive and Council President on the terms of the agenda. Here is the County Executive discussing the issues with them:

The AIM seniors agenda includes the following four points:

· Senior Housing: Require developers of housing projects built on county-owned land to set aside a portion of affordable and market rate units for 60+ residents. County also to leverage senior housing on private projects.

· Affordable Housing Money. Phase in full funding of the Housing Initiative Fund with general fund property tax dollars rather than bond funding beginning in FY 2014.

· Senior Housing Plan: Create a senior housing plan with AIM that includes yearly measurable goals.

· Transportation. Work on and fund creative senior transportation solutions that support Aging in Place.

These are all initiatives we can and must proceed with. For my own part, I am working with Council President Berliner on an initiative to promote mobility for seniors through transportation policy solutions. I have had some preliminary meetings with folks from the Commission on Aging and the plan is to have proposals this year that will address transportation issues.

On the question of housing, the perception out there is that when the county creates urban areas with condo and apartment buildings, we are just trying to lure young adults to the county. The reality, as anyone who knows the population of residents that currently lives on the 355, from Friendship Heights to Rockville, is that seniors are a huge market for this housing.

As the county’s population ages, boomers who are in single family houses today would transition to the condo/apartment lifestyle, opening up single family housing for millennials in search of a little more space for the family. Over lifespans, we need enough of each type of housing for everyone to trade places. Today, however, I do not believe the county has enough multi-family housing to make this possible.



By

Daily journal, 11-22-11

The morning began with a meeting on the topic of the Metropolitan Branch Trail. At a recent T&E committee meeting I learned that the nonprofit group that manages the historic B&O Train Museum has reversed its position and now refuses to grant the county right of way for the Metropolitan Branch Trail. This is very unfortunate as community and elected leaders rallied behind funding for the restoration of that museum partly on the grounds that it would provide an excellent community asset on the trail. This is an issue we will return to in the capital budget process in January. If you ride the Red Line you may notice how much progress DC has made on the trail — and that the progress seems to stop as you cross into Montgomery County. This segment of the trail is an important issue that needs to be resolved in order to continue forward.


The discussions with the team about organizing for the town hall we are hosting on December 12 as well as policy issues related to economic development.

At noon, a meeting with officials from the Housing Opportunities Commission to discuss how to improve production of affordable housing. The council is going to consider a new housing policy in January, although that is more of an aspirational document. I am looking for some concrete steps we can take to support affordable housing production.

Then a meeting with Dick Lipsky, manager of the MCPS TV network, as well as Neil Greenberger, the council staffer who manages our part of the county cable network. We talked about ideas for the future of the cable system and continued the follow up from our last Gov Ops committee meeting, where the focus was on building the system we really want for the future. The cable groups have been discussing a new governance model, which is a helpful step. We are contemplating various recommendations for moving forward and I think there is growing consensus that significant changes are needed.

Next continuing discussions about economic development policy and how the county can be more effective in how we market the county to companies and grow our job base. We’re going to see a lot of policy initiatives next year on this topic and I am very optimistic about where we are headed.

Have a happy thanksgiving everyone!